Progressive Era Essays (670 words) - Freemen Of The City Of London

Progressive Era The Progressive Era The first years of the 1900s is referred to as the ?Progressive Era.? This is because reformer were successful in what they did. Their reforms helped America ?progress? to new changes. Teddy Roosevelt is one of these reformers. He broke up the large railroad trust. The four big railroads in the Northwest was controlled by one holding company by the name of the Northern Securities Company. Since this company owned all the stock in the four major railroads it set all of the rates. So Roosevelt sued the NSC under the Sherman Antitrust Act for having a monopoly. Roosevelt then broke up the beef trust, the oil trust, and the tobacco trust. This reform helped America progress to new changes because Roosevelt started to get the federal government to regulate big businesses and help out the consumer; something that had not been focused on too heavily. Roosevelt also involved the federal government in the coal strike of 1902. The miners went on strike to improve their working conditions but the mine owners refused to deal with the miners. Then Roosevelt intervened and got the discussions between he miners and the owners started. He wanted to see that the miners got a ?squar e deal? and that is what happened. Roosevelt was important in reforming and progressing America by involving the government in regulating big businesses and helping out the common man. Middle class reforms made many changes in America. In many cities all over the country reform mayor were being elected But then in some cites the reform mayors were dying out. To make sure this would not happen some cities got rid of the mayor and city council and replaced them with a small commission. Each member ran a different part of the city. The commission made laws and policies for the cities. Other cities made a city manager. The manager was not a politician. A trained manager carried out the policies set by a small council. Following the lead of Wisconsin and Robert La Follette, state governments made many reforms. Voters had the right to chose candidates for public office, a commission was set up to control railroad rates a competitive civil service was created, restrictions were put on lobbying, and laws were passed for conservation, supervision of state banks, and higher taxes taxes on corporations. Most states began passing child labor laws, workman's compensation was es tablished, women minimum wage laws were started, and intoxicating liquors were outlawed. These changes in state and city governments were major factors in progressing America to a more equal and unique nation because of the new ways cities were run and the laws of the states. Woodrow Wilson made important reforms to the progression of America. He started out by making tariff reforms. He did not necessarily want free trade but free opportunity for American business. The duties proposed provided some revenue for the treasury but would not make industries that no longer needed tariff protection richer. To make up for lost revenue a low rate income tax was included. Though the public felt strongly about this bill and a new tariff policy was created. Wilson also created the Federal Reserve Act. This was for banking and currency reform. The country was divided into twelve districts each with a Federal Reserve bank. Every national bank had to become a member of the Federal Reserve System. The Federal Reserve banks were the ? Bankers' banks. They held the banks' reserves, lent money to a member bank and performed other duties. The Federal Reserve Act created a new currency too. Federal Reserve Notes could be issued according to the needs of the business communiti es. This act helped the member banks in time of panic. These reforms helped America progress by making a new trade law and a new flexible currency along with an easier banking method. These reforms and changes made by presidents, governors, and mayors helped America progress. So the early 1900s could accurately be described as the ?Progression Era.? History Essays

Does Democracy Sample Essay Examines the Rights of Citizens?

Does Democracy Sample Essay Examines the Rights of Citizens?Does Democracy Sample Essay Examines the Rights of Citizens? It should, but sadly it doesn't. Read on to discover why democracy doesn't examine the rights of citizens and why you should avoid it at all costs.Democracy is an old concept. It goes back hundreds of years, even to ancient Athens. Yet there is a problem with democracy: it is not based on any particular principles. For example, what is democracy really based on?Most people would agree that a fair distribution of wealth is a principle of democracy. But how exactly is this fair? You don't just hand out money to the poor and give it to them in a lump sum. That would not be fair, would it? Fair distribution is about knowing what one has or is entitled to, something that is measured against your abilities, not just arbitrarily chosen by somebody.That is why, in every country, we find that the decent standard of living is determined by a people's merit. No nation is perf ect and no one country can be trusted. There are always issues of unfairness. But if you look at the goodness of the standards and conditions of living, you will realize that the good society is a result of well-defined human rights, which are not randomly selected.Of course, we can understand this from the benefits that we derive from democracy, but do we get a fair definition of what democracy actually means by democracy? This is where the difference between democracy and anarchy becomes clear.Anarchy means a state of things in which no one has control over their life and the whole society is a chaos. There is no such thing as an individual who is given a seat at the head of society. In such a society there is no law which is valid and none can be defied. A thousand armed men may take up arms against one.Democracy means a nation where there is no such thing as a government. If it were so, then people would be able to say that they are above the law and could rob and plunder the co mmon people of the nation. But that is the level of tyranny, and nothing can be achieved by that.So does democracy examine the rights of citizens? No, in fact the opposite is true. Democracy is a farce, and anarchy is the only form of government that can be effective.